🔗 Share this article

Internationally, nations are investing enormous sums into what's termed “sovereign AI” – developing national artificial intelligence systems. Starting with the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, countries are vying to develop AI that grasps native tongues and local customs.

The Worldwide AI Arms Race

This initiative is an element in a broader global competition dominated by tech giants from the United States and the People's Republic of China. While firms like a leading AI firm and Meta allocate substantial capital, developing countries are also taking their own gambles in the artificial intelligence domain.

However with such huge investments involved, is it possible for smaller states attain significant benefits? As noted by a specialist from a prominent thinktank, “Unless you’re a rich government or a major corporation, it’s a substantial hardship to create an LLM from nothing.”

National Security Issues

Numerous nations are reluctant to use overseas AI systems. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, as an example, Western-developed AI solutions have sometimes been insufficient. A particular instance saw an AI assistant employed to educate pupils in a distant area – it communicated in English with a thick American accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for local students.

Then there’s the national security dimension. In the Indian security agencies, employing specific external models is considered not permissible. Per an developer noted, It's possible it contains some arbitrary data source that might say that, for example, Ladakh is not part of India … Utilizing that particular AI in a defence setup is a big no-no.”

He continued, I’ve consulted individuals who are in defence. They wish to use AI, but, setting aside specific systems, they prefer not to rely on American platforms because details could travel overseas, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

National Projects

As a result, several nations are supporting domestic ventures. A particular such project is in progress in the Indian market, wherein a company is working to build a national LLM with government backing. This project has committed approximately a substantial sum to artificial intelligence advancement.

The expert envisions a system that is less resource-intensive than premier models from US and Chinese corporations. He explains that India will have to compensate for the resource shortfall with skill. Located in India, we do not possess the option of investing billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we compete versus say the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the America is investing? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the brain game plays a role.”

Native Focus

Throughout the city-state, a public project is backing language models trained in the region's local dialects. These languages – for example Malay, Thai, Lao, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and others – are commonly underrepresented in Western-developed LLMs.

It is my desire that the experts who are building these sovereign AI models were informed of how rapidly and just how fast the leading edge is moving.

A senior director participating in the program notes that these tools are created to enhance more extensive systems, instead of substituting them. Systems such as ChatGPT and Gemini, he says, frequently find it challenging to handle native tongues and local customs – communicating in unnatural the Khmer language, as an example, or proposing meat-containing meals to Malay individuals.

Building local-language LLMs allows state agencies to code in local context – and at least be “smart consumers” of a advanced tool built overseas.

He further explains, I am prudent with the concept national. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we wish to be more adequately included and we wish to comprehend the capabilities” of AI technologies.

Multinational Cooperation

For nations seeking to carve out a role in an escalating international arena, there’s another possibility: team up. Experts affiliated with a well-known institution have suggested a public AI company distributed among a alliance of middle-income nations.

They call the proposal “a collaborative AI effort”, drawing inspiration from the European effective strategy to build a competitor to a major aerospace firm in the 1960s. Their proposal would entail the establishment of a public AI company that would combine the capabilities of various countries’ AI initiatives – for example the UK, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, the Swiss Confederation and the Kingdom of Sweden – to develop a viable alternative to the Western and Eastern leaders.

The primary researcher of a study setting out the concept says that the concept has attracted the attention of AI leaders of at least a few states to date, as well as several state AI firms. While it is presently targeting “mid-sized nations”, developing countries – the nation of Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have also shown curiosity.

He elaborates, “Nowadays, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s diminished faith in the commitments of the existing US administration. People are asking for example, should we trust such systems? In case they decide to