🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are more and more enabling the radical right to set the political agenda, as per a recent research carried out in Germany.

Academics discovered that this trend has inadvertently helped radical groups by validating their ideas and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Based on Over 20 Years of Media Reporting

The results, released in the European Journal of Political Research, relied on an computerized content review of more than 520,000 articles from six German newspapers.

Capital-based scholars observed that as the radical faction moved from fringe issues in the 1990s era to core themes like assimilation and immigration, mainstream political groups progressively adjusted their communication in response.

This adaptation boosted the spread of these concepts and signaled to the electorate that such positions were acceptable.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Public discourse by established political groups is crucial in the electoral success of the far right," stated a political sociologist involved in the study.

"This factor has been underestimated," she added.

The effect was noticeable even when mainstream parties were condemning the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the researcher commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is crucial."

Mainstreaming Phenomenon Throughout Europe

While the research was centered around the German context, this mainstreaming phenomenon is likely to affect nations throughout the European continent.

"You see this a lot in European media," said another researcher. "The far right makes a statement and everyone starts talking about it for one week."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he added.

Hardening of Political Discourse

At certain points, leaders have also hardened their language to match that of the far right.

In a recently published discussion, a former national leader called for widespread expulsions and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Similar instances can be observed across the continent, as elected officials from nations ranging from the UK to France embrace the rhetoric of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has created an echo chamber that would have been unthinkable a decade ago.

Central Problem: Who Sets the Narrative?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are talking about cultural issues – migration, integration – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the radical right, that's the whole idea of agenda setting," clarified a researcher.

Other parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the strict platform of the far right, despite studies suggests that this approach drives the electorate to vote for the far right.

Gradual Influence and Public Perception

The extent of information gathered showed that the influence of far-right parties had been progressive and had grown with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," commented a researcher. "But if you hear this negative framing around migration every second week, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this storyline gains more traction."

Requirement for Established Parties to Develop Their Distinct Narratives

The research highlighted the necessity for mainstream parties to carve out their distinct narratives, especially on subjects such as migration and assimilation, instead of constantly trailing after the far right.

"It's like a dance," said one author. "When the leader is radical and you're responding to them, you lose the ability to choose which music should be heard."